Pope Francis’ passing on April 21, 2025, sent the betting industry into overdrive. Who would have predicted such a thing? Over $1 million worth of bets placed on offshore betting sites, including Polymarket and Zeitgeist, lost out as they did not foresee the date of the Pope’s death. Bettors took guesses on everything from the date to the cause, especially after pneumonia had recently taken a toll on Francis’ health.
As the Vatican grieves and plans for a historical funeral, the controversy surrounding these bets has sparked conversations about morals, rules, and what lies ahead for prediction markets. Here’s what happened, why it has sparked discussions, and what it means for the iGaming industry.
A Million Dollars Down the Drain
Pope Francis died from a stroke and cardiac arrest at 88 years of age, a day after blessing crowds at St Peter’s Square. His death caught many by surpise—including bettors. There was a flurry of activity on the crypto prediction site Polymarket for bets on whether Francis would die before April 30, 2025, or on that exact date. Another blockchain site called Zeitgeist had markets on the cause of death, including pneumonia or heart failure. With the news confirmed by the Vatican that the bishop had suffered a stroke-induced coma and heart failure, most bets ended up being wrong, voiding $1 million in bets, per CBS News.
These were not casino bets, but part of “prediction markets” where users bet in cryptocurrency on real-world outcomes, such as elections and celebrity events. According to Axios, Polymarket's betting model attracts a young, tech-savvy crowd, with 65% of its U.S. users aged 18–34, who utilize stablecoins like USDC. Speculation about the Pope’s health was intense after he got double pneumonia and had a month-long hospital stay in February 2025, leaving the punters with nothing. X posts from @CryptoBetting vented frustration, with one user griping, “Lost 0.1 BTC on a pneumonia bet—didn’t see stroke coming.”
The Ethics of Betting on Death
Gambling on the death of a pope is not unheard of but still controversial. The online offerings in question are hosted on unregulated offshore platforms. According to Reuters, a Vatican spokesperson from the Catholic Church denounced the bets as “disrespectful and morally reprehensible” because they exploit a sacred moment. Groups like the National Council on Problem Gambling felt the same, warning that such markets normalize gambling on tragedy.
Critics on social media platforms, such as @FaithEthics, labelled the bets “ghoulish” and wondered why they are allowed. However, others consider prediction markets as a type of free expression and economic forecasting. Shayne Coplan, CEO of Polymarket, stated to Forbes that these markets were intended to aggregate people’s sentiment, not to offend anyone. He also mentioned that these markets are used to predict election outcomes with an accuracy of 80%. Even so, the loss of $1 million highlights the risks; some of those betting did not understand that offshore sites do not offer U.S. consumer protections, so there are no mechanisms in place to resolve disputes.



Reviews (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!